Navigation auf uzh.ch

Suche

Psychologisches Institut Sozial- und Wirtschaftspsychologie

Themen für Masterarbeiten

  • Informationen zur Masterarbeit
    In der folgenden Übersicht finden Sie Themenbereiche, Einzelthemen und evtl. extern betreute Einzelthemen. Bei Interesse wenden Sie sich bitte an eine der genannten Kontaktpersonen.
    Bitte fügen Sie Ihrer Bewerbung für eine Masterarbeit neben einem kurzen Lebenslauf auch ein ca. einseitiges Motivationsschreiben bei, in welchem Sie erklären, warum Sie sich für das Forschungsprojekt bewerben.

    Pro Themenbereich können jeweils ca. 2 bis 4 Masterarbeiten vergeben werden.
    Die Masterarbeit darf erst nach Rücksprache mit der/dem (Ko-)Betreuer/in gebucht werden.
    Betreuungsperson der Masterarbeit: Prof. Dr. J. Gross

Übersicht der Masterarbeitsthemen dieser Professur

Durch Klick auf die einzelnen Themen werden die Detail-Informationen angezeigt.

 


offen:


vergeben:

  • The value of groups - Cooperation, migration, and exclusivity

    Beschreibung: Cooperation plays a pivotal role in addressing shared problems and increasing joined welfare beyond what individuals alone are capable of. Yet, cooperation is also fragile. Individuals can be tempted to free-ride on the cooperation of others and numerous studies have shown that free-riding can quicky crowd out group cooperation altogether. Groups that do manage to overcome this free-rider problem may therefore become very selective about who is allowed to join the group and who is not. In this project we want to experimentally investigate to which degree group cooperation leads to increased exclusivity, in the sense that group members more likely block attempts of others to join their group, ultimately leading to more pronounced fault-lines between social groups.

    For this project, we will design an interactive lab-study that will be performed by you together with a team of other students. We will invite groups of participants that will interact in real-time across computer-terminals in our social interaction laboratory. The resulting paper can be written in German or English.


    Related literature:

    Marotzke, J., Semmann, D., & Milinski, M. (2020). The economic interaction between climate change mitigation, climate migration and poverty. Nature Climate Change, 10(6), 518-525.

    Efferson, C., Roca, C. P., Vogt, S., & Helbing, D. (2016). Sustained cooperation by running away from bad behavior. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(1), 1?9. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.05.003

    Ehrhart, K.-M., & Keser, C. (1999). Mobility and Cooperation: On the Run. Working Paper. Retrieved from https://www.cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/99s-24.pdf

    Cinyabuguma, M., Page, T., & Putterman, L. (2005). Cooperation under the threat of expulsion in a public goods experiment. Journal of public Economics, 89(8), 1421-1435.

    Charness, G., & Yang, C.-L. (2014). Starting small toward voluntary formation of efficient large groups in public goods provision. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 102, 119?132. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.03.005

    Page, T., Putterman, L., & Unel, B. (2005). Voluntary association in public goods experiments: Reciprocity, mimicry and efficiency. The Economic Journal, 115(506), 1032-1053.

    Ahn, T. K., Isaac, R. M., & Salmon, T. C. (2008). Endogenous Group Formation. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 10(2), 171?194. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9779.2008.00357.x

    Ahn, T. K., Isaac, R. M., & Salmon, T. C. (2009). Coming and going: Experiments on endogenous group sizes for excludable public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1?2), 336?351. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.06.007

    Khadjavi, M., & Tjaden, J. D. (2018). Setting the bar - an experimental investigation of immigration requirements. Journal of Public Economics, 165, 160?169. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.07.013

    Cimino, A. (2011). The Evolution of Hazing: Motivational Mechanisms and the Abuse of Newcomers. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 11(3?4), 241?267. doi: 10.1163/156853711x591242

    Rand, D. G., & Nowak, M. A. (2013). Human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(8), 413?425. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.003


    Anzahl Arbeiten für dieses Thema: 3
    Zeitrahmen: FS23
    Eingabedatum: 06.12.2022
    Kontakt: Prof. Dr. Jörg Gross, E-Mail

    Status: vergeben (erfasst / geändert: 10.08.2023)
  • Intergroup contact and cooperation

    Beschreibung: Humans work together in groups to tackle shared problems and contribute to local club goods that benefit other group members. Whereas benefits from club goods remain group-bound, groups are often nested in overarching collectives that face shared problems like pandemics or climate change. Such challenges require individuals to cooperate across group boundaries, raising the question how cooperation can transcend beyond confined groups. Here we test to which degree intergroup interactions allow groups to transition from group-bound to universal cooperation.

    For this project, we will design an interactive lab-study that will be performed by you together with a team of other students. We will invite groups of participants that will interact in real-time across computer-terminals in our social interaction laboratory. The resulting paper can be written in German or English.


    Related literature:

    Chakravarty, S., & Fonseca, M. A. (2014). The effect of social fragmentation on public good provision: An experimental study. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 53, 1?9. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2014.07.002

    Dorrough, A. R., & Glöckner, A. (2016). Multinational investigation of cross-societal cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(39), 10836?10841. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1601294113

    Chakravarty, S., & Fonseca, M. A. (2017). Discrimination via Exclusion: An Experiment on Group Identity and Club Goods. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 19(1), 244?263. doi: 10.1111/jpet.12182

    Tateishi, W., Hashimoto, H., & Takahashi, N. (2021). Reputation of Those Who Cooperate Beyond Group Boundaries: A Comparison of Universalistic and In-Group Favoring Strategies. Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science, 12(2), 46?53. doi: 10.5178/lebs.2021.89

    Wit, A. P., & Kerr, N. L. (2002). ?Me versus just us versus us all? categorization and cooperation in nested social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 616?637. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.83.3.616

    Aaldering, H., & Böhm, R. (2020). Parochial Versus Universal Cooperation: Introducing a Novel Economic Game of Within- and Between-Group Interaction. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(1), 36?45. doi: 10.1177/1948550619841627

    Buchan, N. R., Grimalda, G., Wilson, R., Brewer, M., Fatas, E., & Foddy, M. (2009). Globalization and human cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(11), 4138?4142. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809522106

    Aaldering, H., & Böhm, R. (2020). Parochial Versus Universal Cooperation: Introducing a Novel Economic Game of Within- and Between-Group Interaction. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(1), 36?45. doi: 10.1177/1948550619841627

    Buchan, N. R., Grimalda, G., Wilson, R., Brewer, M., Fatas, E., & Foddy, M. (2009). Globalization and human cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(11), 4138?4142. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809522106


    Anzahl Arbeiten für dieses Thema: 3
    Zeitrahmen: FS23
    Eingabedatum: 03.02.2023
    Kontakt: Jörg Gross, E-Mail

    Status: vergeben (erfasst / geändert: 10.08.2023)